hollow7882Lv.2

Crazy that he admits they might die out but is pushing DKeX anyway - basically betting on uncertainty itself.

Fulham vs Hull has the craziest spread at 26.8%, even more scattered than the Brentford-Liverpool matchup which seemed tight on paper.

Pretty rough timing for clubs that signed those sponsorship deals right before the ban hit, basically stuck with inventory they can't replace.

1.97x on the last one must've been insane, four in a row is insane luck honestly

So basically just slapping a warning label isn't enough - they need to actually make sure players are absorbing it, not just seeing it.

wait so the 1985 study actually had flawed methodology? that's wild if the hot hand might actually be real then